MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087865533 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e318158cb61

Biologic Response of the Intervertebral Disc to Static and Dynamic Compression In Vitro

2007· article· en· W2087865533 on OpenAlexaff
Dongliang Wang, Sheng‐Dan Jiang, Li‐Yang Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggrecanIntervertebral discIn vitroMedicineCompression (physics)Intervertebral diskGlycosaminoglycanCell biologyBiomedical engineeringAnatomyPathologyBiologyMaterials scienceBiochemistryComposite materialOsteoarthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: This study attempts to determine the biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro. OBJECTIVE: To quantitate and compare the changes of histology, Type I and II collagens, aggrecan, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha expression, and apoptosis in rabbit intervertebral discs following static and dynamic compression in vitro. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Compressive stimuli associated with weight-bearing and loading of the intervertebral disc are thought to be important regulators of disc cell metabolism. Very little is known about the different types of mechanical stimuli that may achieve regulation of intervertebral disc cell metabolism. We examined the biologic response of the rabbit intervertebral discs when exposed to static and dynamic compression in vitro. METHODS: The rabbit intervertebral disc explants were in vitro subjected to unconfined uniaxial compression. Static compression of 0.5 and 1 MPa and dynamic compression of 0.5 and 1 MPa were applied at the frequency of 0.1 and 1 Hz for 6 hours, respectively. After loaded with different types of mechanical stimuli, disc explants were examined for histologic changes, collagen I, collagen II, aggrecan, IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression, and apoptosis. RESULTS: The static compressive load was found to suppress gene expression for collagens and aggrecan in the disc, whereas the disc under dynamic compression exhibited significant anabolic change with increase in gene expression for Type I and II collagen and aggrecan. The regional difference of the responses to mechanical loading in vitro was found between the anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus. All loading conditions caused marked histologic changes, up-regulation of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha expression, and increase in TUNEL-positive cells in the intervertebral discs, with the most significant from control was that when statically loaded. CONCLUSION: Mechanical loading is involved in the physiology and pathology of disc degeneration. Static and dynamic compression may induce different biologic response of the intervertebral disc: static compression has catabolic role on the disc, whereas the dynamic load at appropriate level may benefit the synthetic activity and anabolic response of the disc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations180
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207