MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087866434 · doi:10.1107/s0108767302087238

The structure of normal and supercritical boron trifluoride and related studies

2002· article· en· W2087866434 on OpenAlexaff
John F. Turner, Sylvia E. McLain, Chris J. Benmore, Jacob Urquidi

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoron trifluorideSupercritical fluidBoronMaterials scienceChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-density amorphous ice, prepared by compression of ice I, has been annealed isothermally for several hours at 95, 100, 105 and 115 k and structural changes have been continuously monitored using synchrotron x-ray and neutron diffraction techniques.During each anneal structural changes are indicated by changes in the first sharp diffraction peak position in the static structure factor.During each anneal the peak position is initially observed to rapidly change position toward the LDA phase, however, at each anneal temperature the transformation is observed to stop before completion of the HDA to LDA transition, resulting in several metastable intermediate phases.The structure of these intermediate phases were then temperature quenched by rapidly cooling the sample to 40 k, thus allowing detailed S(Q) and G(r) functions to be determined.It is shown that each intermediate phase is unique and the static structure factor functions cannot be reproduced by any linear combination of the measured s(Q) of HDA and LDA.These studies also represent the first comparison of data collected using synchrotron x-ray and neutron diffraction from subsections of the same sample.Using this technique we have quench recovered a total of three metastable intermediate phases, with the implication that there are and infinite number of possible states, thus indicating that the HDA to LDA transition at zero pressure is much more complicated than first thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials ResearchFrench-language works237,207