MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087872632 · doi:10.1021/cm201773n

Structure and Electrochemistry of Two-Electron Redox Couples in Lithium Metal Fluorophosphates Based on the Tavorite Structure

2011· article· en· W2087872632 on OpenAlexaff
B. Ellis, T. N. Ramesh, L. J. M. Davis, Gillian R. Goward, Linda F. Nazar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsostructuralTriclinic crystal systemCrystallographyMonoclinic crystal systemLithium (medication)ElectrochemistryDilithiumChemistryCrystal structureNeutron diffractionRedoxMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryIonPhysical chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An electrochemical and structural study of the two-electron redox couple comprising the tavorite-type series of fluorophosphates Li 1± x VPO 4 F ( x = 0, 1)shows that both intercalation of LiVPO 4 F with Li (to give Li 2 VPO 4 F) and deintercalation (to give VPO 4 F) proceed by a two-phase mechanism. Structural models for each of the three phases were determined by Rietveld refinements of combined neutron and X-ray diffraction data of the isolated pure phase materials. LiVPO 4 F crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1̅ and is isostructural to many known fluorophosphates whereas both Li 2 VPO 4 F and VPO 4 F crystallize in the monoclinic space group C 2/ c, although they have very closely related structures to the parent. Solid-state 6,7 Li NMR studies of Li 2 VPO 4 F reveal the two lithium sites are clearly distinguishable, with more than 100 ppm separation between the resonances. 2D exchange NMR is used to demonstrate the time scale of ion dynamics between the two sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207