MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conductive, Polypyrrole Coating on Mullite/Alumina Fibers for Electrophoretic Deposition of Oxide Matrices

2004· article· en· W2087893788 on OpenAlex
Yahua Bao, Patrick S. Nicholson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Ceramic Society · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypyrroleMaterials scienceElectrophoretic depositionMulliteCoatingComposite materialThermogravimetric analysisScanning electron microscopeFiberMicrostructureConductive polymerConductivityChemical engineeringPolymerCeramicChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mullite/alumina fibers (Nextel™ 720) have been rendered conductive for electrophoretic deposition (EPD) by coating with polypyrrole (Ppy) from an aqueous solution of pyrrole (Py). The polymer coating was characterized by thermogravimetric (TG) analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and conductivity measurements. The Ppy coating thickness is ∼0.1 μm and the fiber resistance 1–2 (kΩ/cm)/fiber tow. A maximum conductivity of ∼48 S/cm was achieved from a 0.005 M pyrrole solution. A Nextel 720/Al 2 O 3 composite was synthesized using Ppy‐coated fibers as the cathode in an EPD cell. The green and sintered microstructures of the resultant composites are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it