MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087900 · doi:10.82308/38850

A machine learning framework for the classification and refinement of hand drawn curves /

2006· article· en· W2087900 on OpenAlex
Shlomo Saul Simhon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Biochimica Polonica · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRepresentation (politics)Hidden Markov modelLearning curveProcess (computing)Machine learningSet (abstract data type)Sketch recognitionGesture recognitionParametric statisticsPattern recognition (psychology)GestureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents a machine learning framework for the automatic classification and refinement of curves. The proposed framework is composed of both a representation and a family of algorithms for making inferences from examples, given suitable guidance from a user. The underlying computational paradigm taken consists of applying Hidden Markov Models to a wavelet representation of the curves of interest, each of which is presented as part of a pair of examples. The learning framework is exemplified by developing a gesture-based interface for two distinct applications: robot path planning and sketch beautification. For each, it is demonstrated that we can learn constraints on curves from a set of examples and apply them to augment rudimentary gesture information from a human operator. Further, it is demonstrated that we can identify what class of curves the human input belongs to, allowing us to automate the curve refinement process for unclassified inputs. Finally, in cases where gesture information is given in the form of an image, it is also shown that the same methodology can be used to detect and extract the most likely parametric curve from the image. There are three key issues that are addressed for the classification and refinement of curves. First, we must establish the way in which the input, training and output curves look like one another. In the framework presented, this likeness is expressed statistically using Hidden Markov Models that extend over multiple curve attributes (such as curve thickness or color) and scales. Second, when attempting to infer a curve, we must also determine the way in which the surrounding curves should affect the inference. Using a hierarchy of Hidden Markov Models, we can impose and exploit probabilistic interactions between multiple curves that make up an entire scene. Finally, in addition to the learned constraints, we must also determine a method for combining user-defined constraints with the Hidden Markov Models. It is shown that we can reformulate the Hidden Markov Models using a regularization framework and allow for the seamless integration of ad hoc biases to the learned models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it