MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087906545 · doi:10.3109/10253890009001129

The Influence of Hyperthermic Stress on the Redox State of Glucocorticoid Receptor

2000· article· en· W2087906545 on OpenAlexaff
Danka Elez, Stojko Vidović, Gordana Matić

Bibliographic record

VenueStress · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
FundersScience and Engineering Research Board
KeywordsGlucocorticoid receptorRedoxHsp70Heat shock proteinChemistryIntermolecular forceReceptorHsp90IntracellularBiophysicsHSF1HomeostasisSignal transductionIntramolecular forceBiochemistryCell biologyBiologyStereochemistryMoleculeInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is hormone-dependent transcription factor which participates in intracellular signal transduction. The reduced state of the receptor sulfhydryl groups is considered a necessary prerequisite for its normal functioning under the homeostatic conditions. The aim of the work presented in this paper was to examine the influence of non-homeostatic conditions - whole body hyperthermic stresses at 41 degrees C and 42 degrees C, on GR redox state. Non-reducing SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis were used to trace alterations of the receptor's redox state. The steroid binding assay was performed in order to examine direct influence of the whole body heat stresses on the receptor thiols. The results obtained show that the 41 degrees C stress leads to formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds between apo-GR and associated heat shock proteins (Hsp90, Hsp70). Apart from intermolecular GR-Hsp90 and GR-Hsp70 disulfide linkages, 42 degrees C hyperthermic stress also caused creation of intramolecular ones within GR. The results imply malfunctioning of intracellular redox control mechanisms under the hyperthermic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStressSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207