Adipose-derived stem cells are an effective cell candidate for treatment of heart failure: an MR imaging study of rat hearts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the potential therapeutic efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) on infarcted hearts. Myocardial infarction was induced in rat hearts by occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). One week after LAD occlusion, the rats were divided into three groups and subjected to transplantation of ASCs or transplantation of cell culture medium (CCM) or remained untreated. During a 1-mo recovery period, magnetic resonance imaging showed that the ASC-treated hearts had a significantly greater left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and LV wall thickening than did the CCM-treated and untreated hearts. The capillary density in infarct border zone was significantly higher in the ASC-treated hearts than in the CCM-treated and untreated hearts. However, only 0.5% of the ASCs recovered from the ASC-treated hearts were stained positive for cardiac-specific fibril proteins. It was also found that ASCs under a normal culture condition secreted three cardiac protective growth factors: vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Results of this study suggest that ASCs were able to improve cardiac function of infarcted rat hearts. Paracrine effect may be the mechanism underlying the improved cardiac function and increased capillary density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it