Rat Spag5 associates in somatic cells with endoplasmic reticulum and microtubules but in spermatozoa with outer dense fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The leucine zipper motif has been identified as an important and specific interaction motif used by various sperm tail proteins that localize to the outer dense fibers. We had found that rat Odf1, a major integral ODF protein, utilizes its leucine zipper to associate with Odf2, another major ODF protein, Spag4 which localizes to the interface between ODF and axonemal microtubule doublets, and Spag5. The rat Spag5 sequence indicated a close relationship with human Astrin, a microtubule-binding spindle protein suggesting that Spag5, like Spag4, may associate with the sperm tail axoneme. RT PCR assays indicated expression of Spag5 in various tissues and in somatic cells Spag5 localizes to endoplasmic reticulum and microtubules, as expected for an Astrin orthologue. MT binding was confirmed both in vivo and in in vitro MT-binding assays: somatic cells contain a 58 kDa MT-associated Spag5 protein. Western blotting assays of rat somatic cells and male germ cells at different stages of development using anti-Spag5 antibodies demonstrated that the protein expression pattern changes during spermatogenesis and that sperm tails contain a 58 kDa Spag5 protein. Use of affinity-purified anti-Spag5 antibodies in immuno electron microscopy shows that in rat elongated spermatids and epididymal sperm the Spag5 protein associates with ODF, but not with the axonemal MTs. This observation is in contrast to that for the other Odf1-binding, MT-binding protein Spag4, which is present between ODF and axoneme. Our data demonstrate that Spag5 has different localization in somatic versus male germ cells suggesting the possibility of different function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".