MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087931417 · doi:10.1179/cmq.2003.42.2.175

A Dynamic Approach to Determining the Surface Tension of a Fluid

2003· article· en· W2087931417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Metallurgical Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSurface tensionBody orificeMechanicsDimensionless quantityWeber numberVolumetric flow rateThermodynamicsMaximum bubble pressure methodChemistryFlow (mathematics)Tension (geology)Materials scienceMechanical engineeringTurbulencePhysicsReynolds number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new formulation has been developed that predicts flow rate of a stream draining from an orifice under the influence of gravity. This model is different from conventional formulations in that it includes the surface tension of the liquid. Results with water and ethylene glycol at various temperatures indicate that it is necessary to account for surface tension under certain conditions including small orifice diameters and operation under low head values. This model is most relevant for liquids of high surface tension including melts such as molten metals, slags and salts. These conditions are accounted for in the Bond number (ρgroh/σ) which is a dimensionless quantity useful in determining conditions when surface tension is expected to have considerable impact. When an operation is such that the 1/Bo approaches unity, the formulation has the greatest relevance. The formulation provides unique possibilities in measuring surface tension since this property is related to flow rate and head which are two variables that can be experimentally determined. Calibrations of the discharge coefficient, Cd, are required to determine frictional losses in the orifice. The surface tension of water at 321.5 K was calculated to be 0.067 N/m which is 1.75% from the value quoted in the literature. The measurement is highly susceptible to error. A rigorous error analysis was performed on the formulation and it was determined that as 1/Bo approaches unity, accuracy in the surface tension measurement significantly improves. It is expected that melt systems are best suited for such measurements since these liquids often exhibit large values of 1/Bo for a given orifice design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it