MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087942960 · doi:10.1021/ie050568m

Using A Packed-Column Model To Simulate the Performance of A Membrane Absorber

2006· article· en· W2087942960 on OpenAlexaff
David deMontigny, Ahmed Aboudheir, Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul, A. Chakma

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPacked bedMicroporous materialAbsorption (acoustics)Work (physics)Hollow fiber membraneMembraneColumn (typography)Materials scienceAqueous solutionCarbon dioxideChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyChemical engineeringThermodynamicsFiberComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineeringOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental results from a gas absorption membrane (GAM) system were simulated using a comprehensive mathematical model. Originally, the model was developed to simulate carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) absorption into aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA) in a packed column. The current work has modified the original model and demonstrates that packed-column models can be altered for membrane-based absorption systems, providing that the gas−liquid contacting mechanism is considered. The experimental data was generated using three GAM modules connected in series that contained microporous hollow-fiber poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) membranes. Simulation results showed that the model predicted the performance of the GAM system with reasonable accuracy. The average absolute deviation (ADD) of the model was 1.9%. This work has demonstrated that packed-column models can be modified with relative ease to simulate the performance of GAM systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207