MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087972851 · doi:10.7202/1003583ar

L’invasion néo-zombie

2011· article· fr· W2087972851 on OpenAlex
Antonio Domínguez Leiva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtZombieHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le cadre de l’esthétique contemporaine du cadavre, il est peu d’images aussi marquantes que la surenchère transmédiatique et véritablement planétaire des morts vivants. Passant des jeux vidéo à la bande dessinée et au nouveau cinéma d’horreur marqué par le traumatisme du 11 septembre 2001, les zombies envahissent aussi la littérature et la critique universitaire qui les avaient jusque-là ignorés. Fidèle au modèle romérien, cette invasion néo-zombie prolonge les grands thèmes du maître : la ville en ruines et l’anomie sociale ; la pandémie et le cannibalisme des morts ; le triomphe de l’iconographie du cadavre galvanisé ; la surenchère dans le détail gore , à la lisière de l’humour ; la paranoïa envers les appareils idéologiques d’État ; le sous-texte religieux d’un Jugement dernier sans rédemption ; enfin, la politique du mauvais goût qui fait des zombies les emblèmes d’une anti-esthétique contre-culturelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it