MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088020675 · doi:10.2118/0308-0085-jpt

Heavy Oil: Optimize Cyclic Steam Stimulation Though Experimental Design

2008· article· en· W2088020675 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Bybee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteamingSteam injectionEnvironmental scienceGeologyOil productionHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Assistant Technology Editor Karen Bybee, contains highlights of paper SPE 109826, "Peace River Carmon Creek Project Optimization of Cyclic Steam Stimulation Through Experimental Design," by P.F. Koci, SPE, and J.G. Mohiddin, SPE, Shell International E&P, prepared for the 2007 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, 11–14 November. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Peace River Carmon Creek is an ultra-heavy-oil lease in northwestern Alberta, Canada, holding nearly 1.27×109 m3 of 7°API oil. The Carmon Creek Project targets approximately half of that oil for development by cyclic steam stimulation (CSS). There are plans for a significant increase in oil production over the next 5 years. The purpose of this study was to optimize CSS well configuration and steaming strategy. Introduction Various thermal-recovery schemes have been piloted at Peace River. At present, CSS is used to extract the oil, most recently with closely spaced multilateral horizontal wells drilled from a central surface pad. The CSS target is the Bluesky formation, an approximately 30-m-thick semiconsolidated-sand layer buried at a depth of approximately 600 m and characterized by a wide range of reservoir properties. These varying reservoir features are expected to result in different optimum CSS-well configurations and steaming strategies for each geologically unique portion of the field. Geological Models Full-Field Model. The Bluesky reservoir in the Carmon Creek Project area generally is classified into two intervals, a poorer-quality estuarine zone with an order of magnitude lower vertical-/horizontal-permeability ratio compared to the underlying better-quality deltaic zone. This generalization does not apply to the entire Peace River field. In some parts of the field, the estuarine zone is of better quality than the deltaic zone. Lower portions of the deltaic zone typically have higher water saturation, termed "basal water zone" (BWZ). The total gross reservoir thickness and the BWZ thickness vary greatly across the field. Bitumen viscosity also is highly variable, both areally and vertically, throughout the Bluesky reservoir. A full-field static reservoir model was built covering an area of approximately 2000 km2 and including more than 400 wells. The main objective was to capture and characterize the regional reservoir differences by use of a 250×250-m coarse areal grid with 0.5-m vertical resolution. Area Models. The full-field static model was divided into six distinct geological areas, and a relatively fine-grid (25×25 m) sector model was constructed for each of these areas. Areas 1 and 2, characterized by high permeability, good seals, thick pay, high oil concentration, high hot-oil mobility, and either an insignificant or no BWZ, have the most favorable reservoir properties for CSS. Area 3 is poorer than Areas 1 and 2 because of the thicker BWZ and somewhat higher oil viscosity (lower hot-oil mobility). Area 4 can be characterized by thin pay, top-gas presence, and very high oil viscosity. This area is likely to be very marginal for CSS application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.688

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207