MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088057034 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.1.161

XONOTLITE IN RODINGITE ASSEMBLAGES FROM THE RONDA PERIDOTITES, BETIC CORDILLERAS, SOUTHERN SPAIN

2003· article· en· W2088057034 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
José Julián Esteban, Julia Cuevas, José María Tubía

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryPyroxeneOlivine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xonotlite, ideally Ca6Si6O17(OH)2, occurs as a major phase in the leucocratic dyke complex that intruded the Ronda peridotites, near the village of Carratraca, Malaga, Spain. Xonotlite occurs as acicular grains in veins parallel to the dykes, as tabular grains along the reaction zone between the serpentinite host-rock and the leucocratic dykes, and as acicular grains replacing hydrogrossular in the matrix of the dykes. It is associated with albite, pectolite and hydrogrossular. Electron-microprobe analyses give a formula (Ca6.05)(Si5.96Al0.01)O17(OH)2 for the acicular and tabular xonotlite, and (Ca6.11)(Si5.92Al0.03)O17(OH)2 for xonotlite replacing hydrogrossular. X-ray powder-diffraction patterns of xonotlite show the presence of two polytypes: M2a2b2c and Ma2b2c. This unusual association (xonotlite, hydrogrossular, pectolite) was produced by the rodingitization of the leucocratic dykes during the serpentinization of the ultramafic massif at low-temperature conditions, 300° to 350°C; it was associated with the production of lizardite in the surrounding serpentinites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207