MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088068760 · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600535

Noninvasive Quantification of Local Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Glucose for Clinical Application Using Positron Emission Tomography and <sup>18</sup> F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy- <scp>d</scp> -Glucose

2007· article· en· W2088068760 on OpenAlexfundno aff
WU Yi-Gen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPetroleum Technology Alliance Canada
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyVoxelNuclear medicineSampling (signal processing)PositronPositron emissionPhysicsFluorodeoxyglucoseFunction (biology)Computer scienceBiomedical engineeringAlgorithmMedicineArtificial intelligenceNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Until now, input function is still required in quantification of local cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (LCMRGlc) using positron emission tomography (PET) and (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG). Some image-derived methods were developed to get input function noninvasively instead of the arterial blood sampling method, but they needed to make complicated corrections manually, so they cannot always be applied in clinic directly. Here, we propose a simple method based on the Patlak approach by using a reference tissue region and without using any information of input function. This simulation study revealed that the present method was in good agreement with Patlak method; the difference between two methods was less than 5%. The statistical errors with two methods were also obtained, and the results showed the accuracy of LCMRGlc estimated with present method was better than that with Patlak method slightly. The simulation results indicated that the calculation of LCMRGlc with present method was quite stable and independent of the choosing of reference tissue region. All of these show that the present method is a good approximation to Patlak method. The calculation with this method is very simple and easy to perform voxel by voxel; therefore, it can be widely used not only in laboratory studies but also in clinical applications although it only provides the relative rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & MetabolismSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207