MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088080806 · doi:10.1021/ic902109p

Diversity of Metal−Ligand Interactions in Halide (X = I, Br, Cl, F) and Halide-Free Ambiphilic Ligand Rhodium Complexes

2010· article· en· W2088080806 on OpenAlexaff
Bradley E. Cowie, David J. H. Emslie, Hilary A. Jenkins, James F. Britten

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHalideRhodiumLigand (biochemistry)Metal halidesMetalPhotochemistryStereochemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction of the neutral ambiphilic ligand 2,7-di-tert-butyl-5-diphenylboryl-4-diphenylphosphino-9,9-dimethylthioxanthene (TXPB) with [{Rh(mu-Cl)(CO)(2)}(2)] yields [RhCl(CO)(TXPB)] (1) (Emslie et al. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5835). Complex 1 is square planar with the TXPB ligand bound to rhodium via the phosphine and thioether donors (these are features common to complexes 2-5, vide infra). Treatment of 1 with Me(3)SiBr and Me(3)SiI allowed for halide substitution to afford [RhBr(CO)(TXPB)] (2) and [RhI(CO)(TXPB)] (3), respectively. The halide co-ligands in complexes 1 and 2 form a strong bridging interaction between rhodium and the borane group in TXPB. The presence of stronger borane-halide coordination in 1 is clearly illustrated by an (11)B NMR chemical shift of 12 ppm versus 27 ppm in 2. In contrast, the iodide ligand in 3 forms only a weak bridging interaction to boron, leading to a B...I distance of 3.125(7) A, and an (11)B NMR chemical shift of 56 ppm (versus 69 ppm for free TXPB). A lower carbonyl stretching frequency in 3 (2002 cm(-1)) versus 1 or 2 (2008 and 2013 cm(-1), respectively) could be attributed to weakening of the Rh-X bond in 1 and 2 as a consequence of halide-borane coordination and/or a shorter Rh-S bond in complex 3. [Rh(CO)(TXPB-F)] (4) and the halide-free cation [Rh(CO)(TXPB)][PF(6)] (5) were accessed by reaction of 1 with [NMe(4)]F and Tl[PF(6)], respectively. Complex 4 is zwitterionic with fluoride bound to boron [(11)B NMR delta 4 ppm; B-F = 1.445(6) A; Rh...F = 3.261(3) A] and an eta(2)-interaction between the cationic rhodium center and the ipso- and ortho-carbon atoms of a B-phenyl ring in TXPB-F. By contrast, rhodium in 5 engages in an eta(2)-interaction with boron and the ipso-carbon of one B-phenyl ring; Rh-B and Rh-C(ipso) bond lengths in 5 are 2.557(3) and 2.362(2) A, respectively. The long Rh-B distance and an (11)B NMR chemical shift of 57 ppm are consistent with only a weak Rh-B interaction in 5, and a CO stretching frequency of 2028 cm(-1) (Nujol), versus 2004-2013 cm(-1) for complexes 1-4, is indicative of greatly reduced electron density in 5, relative to 1-4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207