Isradipine prevents the development of spontaneously occurring cardiac necrosis in cardiomyopathic hamster
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies on the heart necrotizing process at the early stages of hamster polymyopathy have led us to believe that this hereditary disease derives from an anomalous transmembrane ion flux due to the presence of slow Na+ channels that contribute to intracellular Na+ accumulation which promote intracellular Ca2+ overload via the Ca2+ influx through the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger. In the present study, we investigated the potential beneficial effect of chronic treatment with a dual L-type Ca2+ and slow Na+ channel blockers isradipine, on the development of necrosis in myopathic hamster hearts. Young cardiomyopathic (CM) hamsters (CMH) were treated with isradipine (0.1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) and nifedipine (1 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) for 4 consecutive weeks. Microscopic assessments were carried out in staged serial paraffin sections of heart ventricles from tissues freshly dissected at autopsy. In comparison with control nontreated hearts, which exhibited numerous necrotic calcific foci, myolytic lesions, and dilated right ventricle, isradipine treatment prevented, in a significant manner, all the above spontaneous pathological changes, while nifedipine had no effect. Our present observations provide evidence for the first time that in vivo treatment with a DHP Ca2+ channel blocker, isradipine, is cardioprotective against the development of necrosis in hereditary cardiomyopathy in the hamster. It is possible that the protective effect of isradipine in CMH could be largely due to the indirect blockade of Ca2+ influx through the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger as well as to possible direct blockade of Ca2+ influx through the T-type Ca2+ channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".