MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088099099 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2011.6139815

Cross-layer dynamic subcarrier allocation in multiuser OFDM system with MAC layer diverse QoS constraints

2011· article· en· W2088099099 on OpenAlexaff
Penghui Mi, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubcarrierComputer sciencePhysical layerQuality of serviceOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingPHYComputer networkChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Real-time computingWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiuser OFDM (MU-OFDM) is widely applied nowadays to provide diverse Quality of Service (QoS) for multiple users. Subcarrier allocation according to the instantaneous channel state information (CSI) in MU-OFDM system has been well studied while the research of allocating subcarriers to each user constrained by diverse QoS requirements still remains large space undisclosed. In this paper, in order to meet users' diverse QoS requirements in MU-OFDM system, we propose a cross-layer dynamic subcarrier allocation algorithm where users' MAC layer diverse QoS requirements and the subcarrier allocation at PHY layer are jointly considered. The MAC layer queue status is modeled as a finite-state Markov chain (FSMC), using which the QoS constraints are transformed to the minimal PHY layer data rate requirement of each user. A sub-optimal dynamic subcarrier allocation algorithm is then proposed not only to satisfy the PHY layer data rate but also to significantly reduce the computational burden, aiming at maximizing system capacity. Finally, we verify the proposed cross-layer algorithm by simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207