MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2088104528 · doi:10.4141/p03-021

Evapotranspiration efficiency of pea in south and central Alberta

2004· article· en· W2088104528 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Ross H. McKenzie, A. B. Middleton, N.A. Flore, E. Bremer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsSativumEvapotranspirationAgronomyPisumSoil waterSeedingWater-use efficiencyEnvironmental scienceGrowing seasonPrecipitationWater extractionWater contentHydrology (agriculture)HorticultureExtraction (chemistry)Soil scienceChemistryBiologyIrrigationEcologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evapotranspiration (ET) efficiency regulates suitability and management of crops on the Canadian prairies. To evaluate the ET efficiency of pea (Pisum sativum L.), soil water depletion and yields as a function of precipitation were determined for Carneval pea at 28 sites in south and central Alberta from 1995 to 1998. Soil water depletion between seeding and harvest was as high as 112 mm at sites with high levels of available soil water at seeding and low to moderate levels of precipitation. Pea was capable of extracting soil water to a depth of about 0.6 m at most sites, but extraction of soil water below this depth was much more variable. At sites where soil water did not limit the depth of soil water extraction, a negative correlation was observed between the maximum depth of effective soil water extraction and the sum of maximum temperature degree-days above 25.6°C. The ET efficiency of pea seed yield ranged from 7.5 to 19.1 kg ha-1 mm-1, with an average value of 13.0 kg ha-1 mm-1. No correlation was observed between ET efficiency and weather variables, such as average temperature, vapor pressure deficit or length of the growing season. Key words: Pisum sativum, water use efficiency, root depth, drought stress

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics→French-language works237,207→