MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088112817 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00478

Low-dose antibiotics: current status and outlook for the future

2014· article· en· W2088112817 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua D. Nosanchuk, Jun Lin, Robert P. Hunter, Rustam Aminov

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaIstituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci BolognettiCranberry InstituteNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFondazione per la Ricerca sulla Fibrosi CisticaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesAgResearch
KeywordsAntibioticsAntibiotic resistanceCurrent (fluid)Intensive care medicineMedicineMicrobiologyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frontiers is more than just

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207