A novel social polymorphism in a primitively eusocial bee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Halictine sweat bees (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) are model organisms for the evolution of altruism, reproductive castes, and eusocial colony organization. Halictine social behavior is not only extremely variable, but also ecologically and evolutionarily labile. Among social species, colony social organization ranges from communal societies of egalitarian females to eusocial and semisocial ones with reproductive queens and more or less sterile workers. A striking aspect of halictine social variation is the mutual exclusivity of communal and eusocial types of colony social organization within the same species, these two types of social behavior being characteristic of different genera and subgenera. We report a recently discovered exception to this rule in a population of Halictus sexcinctus (Fabricius) at Daimonia-Pyla in southern Greece, that contained both communal and eusocial colonies. Moreover, communal and eusocial females exhibit morphological differences that imply a preimaginal developmental switch, which could also underlie the two types of social behavior. That the communal and eusocial forms are not merely cryptic sister species with different social behavior is indicated by the comparison of mitochondrial DNA sequences of two sections of cytochrome oxidase I, which indicate that Greek specimens of both social types are more similar than they are to conspecifics from elsewhere in Europe. The phylogenetic position of Halictus sexcinctus suggests that this unusual communal/eusocial polymorphism may represent an unstable intermediate step in an evolutionary reversal from eusocial to solitary behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".