MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088144429 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2012.6272100

Verification of fixed-point datapaths with comparator units using Constrained Arithmetic Transform (CAT)

2012· article· en· W2088144429 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparatorFixed-point arithmeticArithmeticComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Arbitrary-precision arithmeticAdderPolynomialAlgorithmMathematicsParallel computingFloating pointEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arithmetic Transform (AT) [1, 16, 17] is an efficient spectral technique, to analyze range and precision of fixed-point polynomial datapaths, among other methods including AA [4, 15] and SMT [5]. However, the major inefficiency of AT is that it cannot handle the datapaths with comparator units, which imply the non-arithmetic if-statements. This paper presents the approach, Constrained Arithmetic Transform (CAT), to perform range and precision analysis of fixed-point datapaths with comparator units. A custom branch-and-bound search is also introduced to provide more cutting branches and perform faster analyses of range and precision, by making use of safe and negligible overestimations. Experimental results prove the efficiency of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207