MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088158155 · doi:10.1586/14737175.4.1.61

Course of cognitive functioning in first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders

2004· review· en· W2088158155 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)CognitionPsychomotor learningPsychologyCognitive skillPsychiatryVerbal memoryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of cognitive functioning in patients with first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders can be particularly informative. Through the use of electronic- and bibliography-based searches, the authors identified studies examining the course of cognitive functioning in first episode patients. The results of this review indicated that first episode patients at presentation for treatment often show compromised cognitive functioning, particularly in the domains of verbal learning and memory, psychomotor speed and attention. However, in comparison with patients with a longer illness history, first episode patients demonstrate significantly superior performance. In longitudinal studies of first episode patients, cognitive functioning generally remained static, suggesting limited change in performance over the first several years of the illness. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it