MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088169322 · doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.763918

Eyes wide open: stranger hospitality and the regulation of youth citizenship

2013· article· en· W2088169322 on OpenAlex
Stuart R. Poyntz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Youth Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipHospitalitySociologyDemocracyGovernment (linguistics)Gender studiesMedia studiesPolitical sciencePoliticsLawTourism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAcross the Anglo-American world, a pervasive sense of wariness and concern about strangers continues to haunt influential discourses and practices that regulate and shape youth citizenship. In particular, (1) media-centred accounts of ‘stranger danger’, (2) dominant citizenship discourses taught in schools and (3) government policies regulating young people's civic lives, remain significant in shaping how strangers are made meaningful for youth. Through these discourses and practices, the stranger increasingly comes to be a fetish figure, a body and symbolic form whose very figurability is rendered a problem in the first instance. These developments are problematic, in large part because strangers are a necessary and enabling feature of modern democracies. Accordingly, in this paper, I examine the three aforementioned fields of discourse and practice as they have operated broadly over the past decade in Canada, Britain and the United States. I show how strangers are made difficult and dangerous others for youth and make clear how these constructions regulate and threaten a vibrant public world. I conclude by hinting at how stranger hospitality might be taken up differently in schools (and other public fora) as part of nurturing our collective democratic futures.Keywords: youth citizenshipstranger hospitalitypublic lifemoral regulationthe state Notes1. The EU Kids Online study (Livingstone et al., Citation2011), for instance, suggests that fewer than 10% of young people have received unwanted sexual comments online, while fewer than 9% of youth across the EU have met an online contact offline. In North America, while stranger danger fears centre on worries that children are now more vulnerable to sexual exploitation, both sex crimes against children (down 33%) and the sexual abuse of children (down 61% according to FBI statistics) declined dramatically in the USA between 1992 and 2009 (Finkelhor Citation2011, p. 5). Regarding bullying, while we know this kind of abuse was not invented with the Internet, it is of note that crimes committed by young people have declined significantly in both the USA and Canada since the mid-1990s (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Citation2010a). Moreover, “School violence reported in the National School Crime Survey was down 60% [between] 1995–2005 (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Citation2010b). Hate comments reported by school children [was] down 27% from 1999 to 2007 (Child Trends Citation2010a) … [and the] per cent of teens who feared attacks at school or on the way to school declined … 55% from 1995–2007” (Child Trends Citation2010b) (Quoted in Finkelhor Citation2011).2. The YCC was appointed by the minister responsible for Youth Engagement and was made up of 13 commissioners, including young people, academics, teachers and others working in the third sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it