Traitement endovasculaire d’un anévrisme et d’une sténose de l’artère rénale secondaires à une dysplasie fibromusculaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il existe peu d’information sur le traitement optimal d’une sténose de l’artère rénale (SAR) coexistant avec un anévrisme de l’artère rénale. Nous rapportons le cas d’une SAR serrée, traitée avec succès par la mise en place d’une endoprothèse couverte ayant également exclu un anévrisme associé. Cette approche thérapeutique a amené la normalisation soutenue de la pression artérielle en l’absence d’agents antihypertenseurs ainsi que la correction d’anomalies biochimiques secondaires à la SAR. Limited data are available regarding the optimal management of renal artery stenosis (RAS) with a coexisting renal artery aneurysm. We present a case of high-grade RAS treated successfully with a stent-graft deployment resulting in the exclusion of an associated aneurysm. This therapeutic approach induced the sustained normalization of the blood pressure without antihypertensive medication and the correction of biochemical abnormalities secondary to the RAS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".