MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2088183381 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2014.6947355

Monitoring extreme ice features using multi-resolution RADARSAT-2 data

2014· article· en· W2088183381 on OpenAlexaff
Igor Zakharov, Pradeep Bobby, Des Power, Sherry Warren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceRemote sensingSynthetic aperture radarSea ice concentrationGeologyPolarimetryIcebergBackscatter (email)GlacierImage resolutionSatelliteSpace-based radarRadarSea ice thicknessRadar imagingCryosphereClimatologyRadar engineering detailsComputer scienceGeomorphologyScattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information on extreme ice features (ridges, icebergs etc.) is important for various marine operations. Satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery is capable of monitoring sea ice, identifying and tracking ice features over broad spatial scales. This work investigates possibilities of extreme sea ice features retrieval from various RADARSAT-2 data. Several different beam modes and analysis techniques, such as polarimetric decompositions, were investigated. It was demonstrated that the spatial frequency of sea ice ridges has a very good correlation with the SAR backscatter coefficient. The problem of discriminating glacier ice from sea ice can be resolved by applying Pauli decomposition to full polarimetric data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→