Degradation of Survivin by the X-linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis (XIAP)-XAF1 Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP)-associated factor 1 (XAF1) is a putative tumor suppressor in which expression is significantly reduced in human cancer cell lines and primary tumors. The proapoptotic effects of XAF1 have been attributed to both caspase-dependent and -independent means. In particular, XAF1 reverses the anti-caspase activity of XIAP, a physiological inhibitor of apoptosis. We further investigated the function of XAF1 by examining its relationship with other IAPs. Immunoprecipitation studies indicate that XAF1 binds to XIAP, cIAP1, cIAP2, Livin, TsIAP, and NAIP but not Survivin, an IAP that prevents mitotic catastrophe and in which antiapoptotic activity is exerted through direct XIAP interaction and stabilization. We found that overexpressed XAF1 down-regulates the protein expression of Survivin. Under these conditions, Survivin expression was restored in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 or a XIAP RING mutant that is defective in ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase (E3) activity, suggesting that XAF1 interaction activates E3 activity of XIAP and targets Survivin by direct ubiquitination. In addition, RNA interference targeting endogenous XIAP protected Survivin degradation by XAF1. Furthermore, interferon-beta-mediated XAF1 induction promoted formation of an endogenous XIAP-XAF1-Survivin complex. This complex facilitated Survivin degradation, which was prevented in XAF1(-/-) stable clones. Altogether, our study demonstrates that XAF1 mediates Survivin down-regulation through a complex containing XIAP, supporting dual roles for XAF1 in apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".