MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088196920 · doi:10.1080/00168891003715828

An Elective Affinity: Hans Eichner and Friedrich Schlegel

2010· article· en· W2088196920 on OpenAlexaff
Willi Goetschel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanPhilosophyCitationAphorismClassicsArt historyHistoryEpistemologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes The edition will be published with Schöningh, the publisher of the Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, edited by Ernst Behler in cooperation with Jean-Jacques Anstett and Hans Eichner. Reference to this edition will be made by citation to the number of the volume and page number, followed by the number of the aphorism. The German novel Kahn and Engelmann: Eine Familiensaga, first published in German in 2000 by Picus Verlag in Vienna is now available in a superb translation by Jean Snook. For an insightful discussion of the early role of Spinoza in the development of Schlegel's hermeneutic theory and practice, see Leventhal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Germanic Review Literature Culture TheorySame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207