MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088199355 · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2011.2147307

A New Fractional Random Wavelet Transform for Fingerprint Security

2011· article· en· W2088199355 on OpenAlexaff
Gaurav Bhatnagar, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, Balasubramanian Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBiometric Identification and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelet transformHarmonic wavelet transformSecond-generation wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformConstant Q transformFractional Fourier transformS transformWavelet packet decompositionComputer scienceWaveletLifting schemePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceTop-hat transformAlgorithmMathematicsImage processingImage (mathematics)Fourier transformDigital image processingMathematical analysisFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this correspondence paper, the wavelet transform, which is an important tool in signal and image processing, has been generalized by coalescing wavelet transform and fractional random transform. The new transform, i.e., fractional random wavelet transform (FrRnWT) inherits the excellent mathematical properties of wavelet transform and fractional random transform. Possible applications of the proposed transform are in biometrics, image compression, image transmission, transient signal processing, etc. In this correspondence paper, biometrics is chosen as the primary application; and hence, a new technique is proposed for securing fingerprints during communication and transmission over insecure channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and HumansSame topicBiometric Identification and SecurityFrench-language works237,207