Diversity in occupational therapy: Experiences of consumers who identify themselves as minority group members
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Aim: The occupational therapy profession is in need of self‐examination in view of the extent to which culturally constructed meanings of occupation guide its work within an increasingly diverse practice environment. Methods: Semistructured interviews were completed with 14 individuals who defined themselves as minority group members in order to gain an understanding of their experience of the occupational therapy process. Results: Five themes emerged: the importance of social location, the need for safety and acceptance, avoiding omissions, understanding differences in occupation, and the face of discrimination. Conclusions: Cultural and sexual identities influence occupational choices and interface with the social location of the therapist to influence the therapeutic process. Despite holistic and client‐centred values, the comprehensive nature of occupational therapy is not experienced by clients of minority groups. Practice models are needed that provide directives for the establishment of alliances with minority clients and that highlight the significance of exploring occupational choices, experiences of oppression and the impact of the therapists’ culture on the therapeutic process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it