Strength of hollow circular steel sections filled with fibre-reinforced concrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The strength of hollow circular steel sections filled with normal-strength plain concrete and fibre-reinforced concrete (FRC) was evaluated. First, the case of centrally loaded composite members was considered and the bearing capacity of the columns was calculated using the methods proposed by a European code (EC4) and an American code (LRDF). Some expressions in these codes were validated for the case of FRC by adapting experimental data to introduce the mechanical properties of the FRC. To do this, experimental results of standard tests on FRC (compression and splitting tension) were used as well as data on circular steel columns filled with 2% FRC by volume with different types of fibres (steel, polyolefin). Second, the moment - axial force diagrams for composite members, taking into account the residual tensile strength of FRC, were calculated, showing the advantages of using FRC compared with plain concrete for filling hollow steel sections.Key words: fibre-reinforced concrete, hollow steel columns, composite members, steel fibres, polyolefin fibres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it