Antifeedant and toxic activity of <i>Trichilia americana</i> extract against the larvae of <i>Spodoptera litura</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The biological activity of a crude methanolic extract of Trichilia americana (Sesse and Mocino) Pennington (Meliaceae) was assessed using the Asian armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The extract exhibited strong antifeedant activity in a choice leaf disc bioassay with 0.18 μg cm −2 extract deterring feeding by 50%. In nutritional assays, the crude extract reduced growth, consumption and the utilisation of ingested and digested food in a dose‐dependent manner when fed to larvae, suggesting both antifeedant and toxic activities. When relative growth rates were plotted against relative consumption rates, the growth efficiency of the S. litura fed on diet containing T. americana crude extract was significantly less than that of control larvae. This result further indicates that the extract acts as both an antifeedant and chronic toxin. Toxicity is only seen following ingestion and was not observed following topical application or injection into the hemocoel. Larvae reared initially on extract‐containing diet then transferred to control diet showed nutritional indices comparable to those of larvae fed continuously on control diet. This suggests that the extract is not permanently damaging the insect's digestive tract. The mode‐of‐action of the extract as a chronic toxin remains unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it