MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088288460 · doi:10.1112/s0024609301008724

SET IDEALS WITH ISOMORPHIC SYMMETRY GROUPS

2002· article· en· W2088288460 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Biryukov, Valery Mishkin

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the London Mathematical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicFuzzy and Soft Set Theory
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIdeal (ethics)Pure mathematicsIsomorphism (crystallography)Symmetry (geometry)Order (exchange)Group (periodic table)Set (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)QuotientSeparable spaceAutomorphism groupAutomorphismMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A criterion of isomorphism for symmetry groups of set ideals is provided in terms of ideal quotients and cardinal invariants. Furthermore, set ideals with complete symmetry group are characterized. They form a wide class, comprising, for example, all uniform dense ideals and the ideals of ‘thin’ sets in separable metric spaces. If the symmetry group of a set ideal is not complete, then its outer automorphism group is shown to be cyclic of order 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicFuzzy and Soft Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207