Outer Dense Fibers Serve as a Functional Target for Cdk5·p35 in the Developing Sperm Tail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cdk5 is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues, but its activators, p35 and p39, are principally found in brain, and Cdk5 activity has mostly been associated with brain development, particularly neuronal differentiation and migration. Here we show that the p35 transcript and protein are also present in the testis, and an active Cdk5.p35 complex exists in this tissue as well. Cdk5 and p35 are prominently observed in elongating spermatid tails, particularly over the tail outer dense fibers (ODF). The appearance of Cdk5.p35 proceeds from the proximal to the distal end of elongating spermatids, coinciding with the proximal to distal assembly of ODF along the length of the tail axoneme. Incidentally, increased Cdk5.p35 activity is observed in isolated elongating spermatids and at a time when elongating spermatids appear in the developing testis, suggesting a role for Cdk5.p35 in spermiogenesis. The presence of Cdk5 and p35 in ODF isolated from rat sperm tails implies a strong association among these proteins. In vitro ODF phosphorylation by Cdk5.p35 and decreased in vivo sperm tail ODF phosphorylation in p35-deficient mice indicate that Cdk5.p35 is an integral component of ODF and that ODF is a functional Cdk5.p35 target in the testis. Our results demonstrate for the first time that Cdk5.p35 may participate in the regulation of sperm tail development via a mechanism involving ODF phosphorylation. Apparently, as in brain development, Cdk5.p35 plays a part in testis development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".