DIRECT IMAGING OF THE DISTAL DURAL RING AND PARACLINOID INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSMS WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION T2 TURBO-SPIN ECHO TECHNIQUE AT 3-T MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of the direct visualization of the distal dural ring (DDR) and adjacent anatomic structures in patients with paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Six consecutive patients (1 man, 5 women; mean age, 45.5 years; age range, 34-51 years) who underwent a 3-T MRI examination for the evaluation of 7 paraclinoid carotid artery aneurysms were reviewed retrospectively. MRI scans were acquired using a T2 turbo-spin echo sequence with 2-mm thickness without gap on the coronal plane perpendicular to the diaphragma sellae. Identifications of the DDR, adjacent regional anatomic landmarks, and paraclinoid aneurysms were analyzed. The locations of the paraclinoid aneurysms were categorized into intradural (aneurysm neck and sac located above the DDR), transdural (aneurysm neck or sac were straddling the DDR), and extradural (aneurysm neck and sac located below the DDR). Interstudy agreement between computed tomographic angiography and 3-T MRI for the anatomic location of the paraclinoid aneurysms was assessed in 6 patients who underwent both examinations. RESULTS: In all cases, the DDR was clearly identified and the relationship between the DDR and the paraclinoid aneurysm was successfully determined on 3-T MRI. The aneurysm locations determined with 3-T MRI were 4 intradural and 3 extradural. A comparison between computed tomographic angiography and 3-T MRI revealed discordant anatomic locations in 3 aneurysms (3 of 6, 50%). CONCLUSION: Direct visualization of the DDR as well as precise evaluation of paraclinoid aneurysm location with high-resolution 3-T MRI is possible. This study shows that high-resolution 3-T MRI is an important means to determine the appropriate management for patients with paraclinoid aneurysms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".