MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088365334 · doi:10.1080/14689367.2014.902038

First hyperbolic times for intermittent maps with unbounded derivative

2014· article· en· W2088365334 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDynamical Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsTangentHyperbolic functionDistribution (mathematics)Boundary (topology)TowerSquare (algebra)Range (aeronautics)Limit (mathematics)Pure mathematicsMathematical analysisHyperbolic setFunction (biology)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We establish some statistical properties of the hyperbolic times for a class of non-uniformly expanding dynamical systems. The maps arise as factors of area preserving maps of the unit square via a geometric baker’s map-type construction, exhibit intermittent dynamics, and have unbounded derivatives. The geometric approach captures various examples from the literature over the last 30 years. The statistics of these maps are controlled by the order of tangency (linked to a single parameter α, where 0 < α < ∞) that a certain ‘cut function’ makes with the boundary of the square. Previously, a direct Young tower construction has been used to obtain optimal correlation decay rates of O(n−1/α) for Hölder observables and all values of the parameter α. A central limit theorem (CLT) is obtained when 0 < α < 1.The asymptotics of a natural hyperbolic time for this family of maps are analysed via the same Young tower. By using a large deviations result of Melbourne and Nicol, we prove that the first hyperbolic time is integrable if and only if the parameter satisfies 0 < α < 1. Furthermore, within this restricted range of parameters, concentration inequalities recently established by Chazottes and Gouëzel imply sharp O(n−1/α) bounds on the tail distribution of first hyperbolic times. As shown by Alves, Viana, and others, knowledge of the tail distribution of the hyperbolic times leads to upper bounds on the rate of decay of correlations and derivation of a CLT. Comparing to the results obtained directly for this family of maps, the latter estimates via hyperbolic times are suboptimal, even over the restricted range of parameters 0 < α < 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it