MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088384059 · doi:10.2166/hydro.2011.098

Hybrid Pareto archived dynamically dimensioned search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization: application to water distribution network design

2011· article· en· W2088384059 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Asadzadeh, Bryan A. Tolson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydroinformatics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)Metric (unit)Multi-objective optimizationPareto principleMathematical optimizationComputer scienceSearch engineAlgorithmMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pareto archived dynamically dimensioned search (PA-DDS) has been modified to solve combinatorial multi-objective optimization problems. This new PA-DDS algorithm uses discrete-DDS as a search engine and archives all non-dominated solutions during the search. PA-DDS is also hybridized by a general discrete local search strategy to improve its performance near the end of the search. PA-DDS inherits the simplicity and parsimonious characteristics of DDS, so it has only one algorithm parameter and adjusts the search strategy to the user-defined computational budget. Hybrid PA-DDS was applied to five benchmark water distribution network design problems and its performance was assessed in comparison with NSGAII and SPEA2. This comparison was based on a revised hypervolume metric introduced in this study. The revised metric measures the algorithm performance relative to the observed performance variation across all algorithms in the comparison. The revised metric is improved in terms of detecting clear differences between approximations of the Pareto optimal front. Despite its simplicity, Hybrid PA-DDS shows high potential for approximating the Pareto optimal front, especially with limited computational budget. Independent of the PA-DDS results, the new local search strategy is also shown to substantially improve the final NSGAII and SPEA2 Pareto fronts with minimal additional computational expense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HydroinformaticsSame topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207