Bibliographic record
Abstract
My reviewing task this quarter is a small pile of CDs ranging chronologically from Giovanni Battista Sammartini to Mendelssohn, and geographically from the Spain of Boccherini, the Milan of Sammartini and the Eszterháza of Haydn to the Stockholm of Kraus. These are mainly chamber works, for various instrumental combinations. Even the six little Sammartini symphonies include just two that require more than two- or three-part strings. The only proper exception is a pair of orchestral symphonies by Boccherini. All six works in this programme of Giovanni Battista Sammartini: Symphonies (Naxos 8.557298, rec 2003, 60’) are in three movements (the first, no.62 in the standard Jenkins/Churgin listing, has alternative finales, both being played here). This work includes a pair of trumpets; the last on the CD, J-C4 in C, adds two horns to the strings, which, in two or three parts, otherwise represent the full ensemble. All four of the strings-only works are included (under different numbering) in the volume of The early symphonies edited by Bathia Churgin and published in 1968; the more richly scored ones probably date from around 1750. This is an attractive selection from Sammartini's 60-plus symphonies, all of them mainly short-breathed yet neatly constructed, with energetic fast movements and more languorous and melodious slow ones. The Aradia Ensemble, based in Toronto, is on this showing a talented group, and Kevin Mellon directs sprightly and perceptive readings. With a short but good leaflet note, and resonantly recorded, this is an issue well worth sampling—and buying—especially as none of the pieces is otherwise available, and Sammartini has (or should have) an honoured place in the early history of the symphony. This is a thoroughly enjoyable and impressive disc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.340 | 0.173 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".