Human angiomotin‐like 1 associates with an angiomotin protein complex through its coiled‐coil domain and induces the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Angiostatin is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. One mechanism through which angiostatin inhibits angiogenesis is by binding to the cell surface protein p80-angiomotin. The p80-angiomotin protein promotes angiogenesis, in part, by conferring a hypermigratory phenotype to endothelial cells. Although p80-angiomotin is extensively characterized, less is known about the related protein angiomotin-like 1. We report that angiomotin-like 1 forms part of a protein complex containing p80-angiomotin. Structure-function studies revealed that angiomotin-like 1 associates with this p80-angiomotin-containing complex via its coiled-coil domain. Since p80-angiomotin plays a role in cell migration, a process that involves the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, we then addressed the hypothesis that angiomotin-like 1 may interact with the cytoskeleton. Immunofluorescence studies reveal that angiomotin-like 1 not only co-localizes with filamentous actin but also significantly modifies the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton. Regarding migration, angiomotin-like 1 increases the velocity of migration and decreases the persistence of migration directionality. Together these observations strongly suggest that angiomotin-like 1 is involved in actin-cytoskeleton-based processes, in part, via its interaction with a p80-angiomotin-containing complex and the actin cytoskeleton. These findings have important implications for angiogenesis-driven disease since angiomotin and angiomotin-like 1 are both expressed in capillaries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".