Genetic variation in <i>Trillium erectum </i>(Melanthiaceae), a widespread forest herb in eastern North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trillium erectum L. is an insect-pollinated understory herb widespread in forests of eastern North America. Marker gene studies indicate that the species has a mixed mating system, but aspects of population genetic structure have not been investigated. Using 10 allozyme loci, we measured genetic variation within and among 23 populations sampled from throughout the species' range. Overall, T. erectum displayed moderate levels of genetic diversity in comparison with other herbaceous plants. The percentage of loci that were polymorphic was 52%, with average values (±SE) of 1.20 ± 0.02, 0.08 ± 0.01, and 0.13 ± 0.01 for the number of alleles per locus (A), observed heterozygosity (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He), respectively. There was evidence of inbreeding within populations (Fis = 0.39, 95% CI 0.260.55) and significant population differentiation (Fst = 0.16, 0.050.24). Analysis of genetic data provided no evidence of isolation by distance, and together with the occurrence of population subdivision, this suggests that there is relatively limited contemporary gene flow among populations. Northern populations of T. erectum tended to have less genetic variability than southern populations, probably as a result of historical factors associated with post glacial migration. Limited opportunities for gene dispersal as a result of low plant densities, the capacity for self-fertilization, and local seed dispersal by ants are likely to be the main factors maintaining contemporary patterns of genetic variation in T. erectum. Key words: allozymes, genetic diversity, gene flow, population genetic structure, Trillium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".