MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088401731 · doi:10.5589/m13-041

Object-based classification of Worldview-2 imagery for mapping invasive common reed, <i>Phragmites australis</i>

2013· article· en· W2088401731 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Nicholas Lantz, Jinfei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhragmitesWetlandMultispectral imageGeographyVegetation (pathology)Remote sensingSatellite imageryCartographyPixelObject basedEnvironmental scienceEcologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wetlands provide many environmental and societal benefits. Unfortunately, the importance of wetlands has only recently been acknowledged after centuries of drainage and conversion to other land uses. An emerging threat to North American wetlands is the introduction of invasive plant species such as Phragmites australis, a reed introduced from Europe. Previous high spatial resolution satellite imagery used for mapping Phragmites was limited spectrally to four bands (blue, green, red, and near-infrared). A recently launched satellite, Worldview-2, has four additional spectral bands that may allow for more accurate mapping of Phragmites. In this study, a single-date Worldview-2 image was used to map wetland vegetation at Walpole Island, Canada. Object-based and per-pixel maximum likelihood classifications were performed on a four-band subset simulating traditional multispectral imagery and the full eight-band set of Worldview-2. The overall classification accuracy of 94.0% achieved for the eight-band object-based method was the highest of the four classifications methods used. The accuracy achieved by the eight-band object-based classification shows that single-date Worldview-2 image is promising for distinguishing Phragmites from native wetland plant species late in the growing season in coastal Great Lakes wetlands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2013
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207