Transport in weakly and strongly modulated two‐dimensional electron systems realized by Cleaved‐Edge‐Overgrowth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periodic modulation of a free two-dimensional electron system changes the bandstructure in which the electrons move. A weak modulation opens up small energy gaps in the free electron bandstructure while a strong, short-period modulation leads to the formation of well separated cosine-like minibands. We study transport in both cases using structures grown with the Cleaved-Edge-Overgrowth method. It allows to fabricate high quality two-dimensional electron systems with arbitrary modulation periods which are precise on an atomic scale. Perturbing the system only weakly with a long-period superlattice that is located some distance away from the electron layer leads to magneto-transport characteristics which exhibit each a number of different 1/B-periodic oscillations. These can be very well explained by semiclassical theory and allow the extraction of the Fermi surface of the system. The strong modulation with a short-period superlattice leads to the two-dimensional equivalent of a conventional superlattice. One very important difference lies in the stability of the expected negative differential conductance regime with respect to electric field instabilities. Geometrical considerations show that the observation of stable Bloch oscillations is possible in these systems. We will show that density dependent transport studies confirm the formation of a two-dimensional superlattice. Although negative diffential conductance, also observed in those samples, must be attributed to an inhomogeneous density distribution. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".