MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088416384 · doi:10.1080/16081625.2010.9720864

Managerial Incentives and the Organization of Chinese Processing Trade

2010· article· en· W2088416384 on OpenAlexaff
Huiya Chen, Deborah L. Swenson

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsPricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrossmanIncentiveProductivityIndustrial organizationChinaTariffBusinessProduct (mathematics)Information processingInternational tradeEconomicsInternational economicsMicroeconomicsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chinese processing trade has grown considerably as firms adopted a wide array of organizational forms to have their products assembled in China for export. To understand the organization of processing trade we modify Grossman and Helpman's (2004) model of managerial incentives to account for the economic costs associated with firms' input control decisions in China. We examine Chinese processing trade between 1992 and 2003 to test the model's predictions. As predicted by the model, we find that firm productivity is related to processing choices. In addition, the organization of processing trade is found to match tariff levels at the product level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & EconomicsSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207