MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088454526 · doi:10.1143/jjap.42.l508

Fabrication of Indium Nitride Nanodots Using Anodic Alumina Templates

2003· article· en· W2088454526 on OpenAlexaff
Qixin Guo, Xiangyang Mei, Harry E. Ruda, Tooru Tanaka, Mitsuhiro Nishio, Hiroshi Ogawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanodotMaterials scienceTemplateFabricationNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsNanometreSputteringIndium nitrideNitrideAnodeTemplate method patternSemiconductorThin filmElectrodeLayer (electronics)Composite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A highly ordered uniform InN nanodot array was successfully grown by reactive sputtering using an anodic nanohole channel alumina (NCA) template. The nanodot array replicated the hexagonal lattice pattern of the NCA template with a period space of nanometer scale. The simplicity, flexibility, and practicality of this technique make it a prospective method for developing future optical and electronic devices of III-V nitride semiconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Journal of Applied PhysicsSame topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207