Integrating direct methods into a semi-automated, protein-phasing package
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical determination of the reflection phases is a fundamental problem in Xray crystallography. It is well know that the n-beam diffraction (n-BD) phenomenon can provide a direct solution for the 'phase problem', however, the phases extracted by the actual n-BD phasing techniques are not very precise, mainly due to the uncertainties on the kinematical diffraction present in the process. In this work, we present a simple and innovating mathematical expression -based on the second-order Born approximation-for 3-BD profile simulation, which is capable of dealing with a mixed dynamical/kinematical diffraction regime. By using the linear polarization of synchrotron radiation, a new procedure of X-ray data collection is employed to generate a polarization dependent dataset of 3-BD profiles. The fit of the dataset with the mathematical expression above mentioned has allowed triple-phase measurements with a precision better than 2 as the amount of kinematical diffraction is also determined. Examples are given for several single crystals. The effects of the incident beam divergences and energy resolution on the precision of this phasing technique is discussed as well as its efficiency for practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".