La sédentarisation comme moyen d’adaptation aux baisses de la pluviométrie chez les éleveurs Peuls en Savane tchadienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article s’intéresse aux processus de sédentarisation des éleveurs peuls en zone de savane du Tchad comme moyen d’adaptation aux régimes pluviométriques, devenus de plus en plus aléatoires. À partir des enquêtes menées auprès de 60 unités domestiques des éleveurs reparties dans trois campements, il ressort que la répétition à intervalles de plus en plus courts des crises crée une situation de précarité quasi permanente en particulier chez les éleveurs. Les conditions actuelles de leur exercice sont fortement contraintes par les modifications de leur environnement engendrées surtout par les baisses de la pluviométrie. Comme réponse à ses contraintes, les éleveurs se sont sédentaritsés pour marquer leur espace. Celle-ci révèle une capacité de réponse de ces derniers à s’adapter à des changements dynamiques que pourraient accompagner les politiques publiques en matière d’aménagement du territoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".