Delivering sustainable buildings and communities: eclipsing social concerns through private sector-led urban regeneration and development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delivering sustainable buildings and communities: eclipsing social concerns through private sector-led urban regeneration and development Increasingly, government urban growth strategies support streamlined planning and development processes that soften conditions for private sector developers in the construction and development of "sustainable buildings" and "sustainable communities".Encouraged by a popular embracing of urban intensification as an approach to urban development, these strategies often strengthen the role of private sector intermediaries and consultants in local policy networks (Hackworth and Smith 2001, Adair et al. 2003, Steinacker 2003, Davidson and Lees 2005).Public sector reliance on private sector finance, skills and resources in the delivery of a sustainable built environment has been documented as problematic due to the proliferation of less than optimal sustainable performances, rising land values and expensive housing developments in many new and regenerated areas of our towns and cities (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it