MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2088513700 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.tim2013-a10

Abstract A10: Stromal CAIX expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma and corresponding lymph node metastases

2013· article· en· W2088513700 on OpenAlexaff
Shamir Chandarana, Pinaki Bose, Alexander C. Klimowicz, Stephanie Petrillo, Mie Konno, Luke Rudmik, Steven C. Nakoneshny, Wayne Matthews, Anthony M. Magliocco, Joseph C. Dort, Nigel T. Brockton

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStromal cellImmunohistochemistryLymph nodePathologyHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaRadiation therapyPrimary tumorCancer researchLymphOncologyInternal medicineMetastasisCancerHead and neck cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Hypoxia is an almost ubiquitous feature of human solid tumours. However, the direct measurement of oxygen concentration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has been conducted almost exclusively in the metastatic lymph nodes, not the primary tumor. Hypoxia is associated with resistance to both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy in squamous cell cancers (SCCs). However, endogenous markers of hypoxia (EMH) have not reproducibly predicted clinical outcome. However, historically, the method used to assign hypoxic status according to directly measured oxygen concentration (polarographic electrode) and EMH (typically immunohistochemistry) have fundamentally differed. Methods: Demographic data and clinical outcomes of 61 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated with primary surgery +/- adjuvant radiation were collected. Tissue microarray's with representative samples of patients' tumors were constructed from paraffin-embedded blocks. Automated quantitative immunohistochemistry (AQUA) was performed to measure expression and distribution of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test was used to assess the impact of vimentin-defined stromal CAIX (in both primary tumor and nodal metastases) on survival. Results: High stromal CAIX expression in the primary tumor was associated with significantly worse 5-year disease-specific survival. There was a statistically significant but relatively weak correlation between stromal CAIX expression in the primary tumor and the corresponding lymph nodes (r2:0.359; p=0.013). Stromal CAIX expression in the lymph node metastases was not significantly associated with 5-year disease-specific survival. Conclusions: Previous literature presenting the prognostic impact of directly measured hypoxia, using a polarographic electrode, was based predominantly on measurements from lymph nodes, not the primary tumor. Furthermore, comparisons with EMH were based solely on percentage of tumor cells that were positively stained, not the intensity of staining. We present the results of a tumor comparment-specific, quantitative fluorescent IHC method and the survival associated with EMH in the tumor microenvironment in the primary tumor and lymph node metastases. Citation Format: Shamir Chandarana, Pinaki Bose, Alexander C. Klimowicz, Stephanie K. Petrillo, Mie Konno, Luke Rudmik, Steven C. Nakoneshny, Wayne T. Matthews, Anthony M. Magliocco, Joseph C. Dort, Nigel T. Brockton. Stromal CAIX expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma and corresponding lymph node metastases. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Invasion and Metastasis; Jan 20-23, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→