MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088519794 · doi:10.1145/355354.355378

A WWW-based multimedia center for learning data communications — phase 1

2000· article· en· W2088519794 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Elkateeb, Ala Awad

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCSE Bulletin · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCenter (category theory)Data centerComputer scienceThe InternetMultimediaDistance educationWorld Wide WebComputer networkPsychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of multimedia in education has become an important element to improve the quality of education and to reduce the cost of the educational system. In addition, the students got the benefit of learning and understanding the material better than in the conventional way. In this work, a learning package called "Data Communications Learning Center" (DCLC) has been developed and tested. The main objective of this center is to help university students and others to learn data communication concepts, architectures and operations. The center is a world wide web (www) based, and it allows any student that uses a standard modem for the Internet access to use our center. The center has been developed to be easy to use. The initial evaluation of the center examined by a few students have complemented that the center has improved their understanding to some data communication concepts which the center already supports. Although our intention is to support one topic at the first stage of this project, one can easily add other topics to the center. Any professor who is willing to put his course in the center can achieve this without any prior knowledge about the internal design of the center.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGCSE BulletinSame topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207