MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088546535 · doi:10.1515/jpm.2004.008

Implication of cord blood myeloperoxidase but of soluble p-selectin levels in preterm deliveries

2004· article· en· W2088546535 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kuender D. Yang, C.-L. Wang, Li‐Tung Huang, Hsin‐Hou Chang, Hui‐Chun Huang, Te‐Yao Hsu, Chien‐Hui Ou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Perinatal Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChang Gung Medical FoundationNational Health Research InstitutesUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsMedicineMyeloperoxidaseCord bloodUmbilical cordPhagocyteGestational ageFetusPlatelet activationImmunologyPlateletAndrologyInternal medicineInflammationPregnancyPhagocytosisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although maternal amniotic and vaginocervical cytokines are known to play a role in triggering preterm delivery, the effects of activating fetal phagocytes and platelets are not clear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, we measured levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), a phagocyte activation marker, and soluble p-selectin (sCD62p), a platelet activation marker, in umbilical cord blood samples from 2200 consecutive cord blood collections, 106 of which were from preterm infants. MPO and sCD62p levels were correlated to gestational age and preterm delivery. It was found that MPO levels were significantly higher in preterm infants and were not significantly correlated to gestational age. In contrast, sCD62p levels were lower in preterm infants and were negatively correlated to gestational age. In summary, we showed that fetal phagocyte activation as demonstrated by higher cord blood MPO levels is associated with preterm delivery, but platelet activation as shown by lower sCD62p levels is not. This suggests that fetal phagocyte activation may be implicated in preterm delivery, and subsequently in prematurity-related inflammatory insults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Perinatal MedicineSame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207