MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088564719 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181b40d4f

False-Negative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials During Scoliosis Surgery Causing Paralysis

2009· review· en· W2088564719 on OpenAlexaff
Hitesh N. Modi, Seung-Woo Suh, Jae Hyuk Yang, Ji-Yeol Yoon

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic Effects
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineScoliosisParaplegiaParalysisSomatosensory evoked potentialSurgeryIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringPerioperativeSpinal cord injuryAnesthesiaSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. Case report. Objective. To report a case of false-negative intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEP) that developed paraplegia after surgery. Summary of Background Data. Although several false-negative results have been reported with somatosensory-evoked potentials, there is no report noted with MEP. Therefore, several authors have preferred using MEPs as a gold standard in neuromonitoring. Methods. We report a case of false-negative MEP during the scoliosis surgery which is the first report showing false-negative MEPs during operation. Results. A 15-year-old girl with severe kyphoscoliosis (Cobb angle, 140°) in neurofibromatosis was operated for correction and posterior spinal fusion surgery, using pedicle screw instrumentation. Intraoperative neuromonitoring did not show any change in MEPs throughout the procedure, however, she woke-up with paraplegia. Immediate implant release could not recover her neurology functionally at last follow-up. Positive event during the operation was massive blood loss which could not show drop in MEPs as an ischemic cord injury (probable cause). Postoperative CT scan in both patients did not show any injury with pedicle screw as implants were well placed within the pedicles. Reviewing the literature, we could not find out any prospective study in animals identifying false-negative results with MEPs. Conclusion. From our experience of false-negative MEPs, we conclude that unwanted events with use of MEP in scoliosis or other spinal surgeries. We propose further prospective research on animals to solve this issue. We report a case of false-negative motor-evoked potentials (MEP) during the scoliosis surgery. A 15-year old girl with severe kyphoscoliosis was operated for correction with transcranial-MEP monitoring. Transcranial-MEP were maintained throughout surgery, however, she woke-up with paraplegia. Immediate release of construct could not recover neurology at final follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicIntraoperative Neuromonitoring and Anesthetic EffectsFrench-language works237,207